Age Group Comparison
Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
25-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:27:04
Country: (297 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Laura: -0.2% |
25-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Laura
0.2%
25-29 Age Group
strength
Laura: -20.5% |
25-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Laura
20.5%
25-29 Age Group
running
Laura: +2.5% |
25-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Laura
2.5%
25-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Laura (vs Expected) | 25-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 6:56 (+11.4%) | 4:21 (+0.0%) |
25-29 Age Group
+11.4% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:18 (-7.6%) | 5:03 (+0.0%) |
Laura
+7.6% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:58 (-4.4%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
Laura
+4.4% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 54:22 (+2.5%) | 42:33 (+0.0%) |
25-29 Age Group
+2.5% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:24 (-13.5%) | 3:45 (+0.0%) |
Laura
+13.5% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:41 (-31.0%) | 4:03 (+0.0%) |
Laura
+31.0% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:35 (-22.6%) | 1:37 (+0.0%) |
Laura
+22.6% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:56 (-14.8%) | 4:35 (+0.0%) |
Laura
+14.8% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Laura, Orange = 25-29 Age Group