Age Group Comparison

Beijing 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Men

利保 赵

Place: 587
Time: 2:25:16
Country: China
Percentile: 99.7th
View detailed analysis →

35-39 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:41:01
Country: (153 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic 利保: -19.9% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
利保
19.9%
35-39 Age Group
strength 利保: -27.1% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
利保
27.1%
35-39 Age Group
running 利保: +27.3% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
利保
27.3%
35-39 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category 利保 (vs Expected) 35-39 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 6:11 (-38.5%) 6:05 (+0.0%)
利保 +38.5% better
Row aerobic 5:38 (-6.4%) 5:01 (+0.0%)
利保 +6.4% better
SkiErg aerobic 4:53 (-14.9%) 4:47 (+0.0%)
利保 +14.9% better
Total Running running 68:17 (+27.3%) 39:43 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +27.3% better
Farmers Carry strength 2:35 (-32.1%) 2:26 (+0.0%)
利保 +32.1% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 6:50 (-30.6%) 6:35 (+0.0%)
利保 +30.6% better
Sled Pull strength 7:42 (-26.2%) 6:19 (+0.0%)
利保 +26.2% better
Sled Push strength 5:45 (-5.3%) 3:59 (+0.0%)
利保 +5.3% better
Wall Balls strength 9:03 (-41.4%) 9:18 (+0.0%)
利保 +41.4% better

How to Read This Comparison