Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women Su
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:06:16
Country: (91 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Eva: -1.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Eva
1.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Eva: -1.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Eva
1.4%
16-29 Age Group
running
Eva: +3.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Eva
3.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Eva (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:38 (-6.1%) | 3:05 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+6.1% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:16 (-1.9%) | 4:29 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+1.9% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:12 (+3.2%) | 4:11 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.2% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 29:40 (+3.9%) | 30:21 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:28 (-5.0%) | 1:39 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+5.0% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:54 (-0.3%) | 3:09 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+0.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:20 (-8.4%) | 4:07 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+8.4% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:57 (+7.9%) | 2:05 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.9% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:23 (-1.2%) | 3:44 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+1.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Eva, Orange = 16-29 Age Group