Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:15:30
Country: (320 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Mark: -1.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Mark
1.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Mark: +7.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Mark
7.6%
16-29 Age Group
running
Mark: -6.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Mark
6.2%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Mark (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:28 (-4.2%) | 2:45 (+0.0%) |
Mark
+4.2% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:13 (-1.8%) | 4:27 (+0.0%) |
Mark
+1.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:01 (+3.0%) | 3:59 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.0% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 32:08 (-6.2%) | 37:16 (+0.0%) |
Mark
+6.2% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:26 (-12.0%) | 1:44 (+0.0%) |
Mark
+12.0% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:19 (+6.4%) | 3:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.4% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:49 (+17.5%) | 2:36 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+17.5% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:59 (+23.8%) | 1:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+23.8% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:12 (+2.4%) | 4:31 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.4% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Mark, Orange = 16-29 Age Group