Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:15:30
Country: (320 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Tim: -7.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Tim
7.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Tim: -2.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Tim
2.7%
16-29 Age Group
running
Tim: -1.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Tim
1.4%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Tim (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:35 (-12.1%) | 2:45 (+0.0%) |
Tim
+12.1% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:21 (-2.8%) | 4:27 (+0.0%) |
Tim
+2.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:46 (-6.5%) | 3:59 (+0.0%) |
Tim
+6.5% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 36:38 (-1.4%) | 37:16 (+0.0%) |
Tim
+1.4% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:54 (+7.2%) | 1:44 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.2% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:29 (-0.6%) | 3:17 (+0.0%) |
Tim
+0.6% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:36 (-1.7%) | 2:36 (+0.0%) |
Tim
+1.7% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:45 (-0.3%) | 1:47 (+0.0%) |
Tim
+0.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:39 (-18.2%) | 4:31 (+0.0%) |
Tim
+18.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Tim, Orange = 16-29 Age Group