Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Leah: -5.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Leah
5.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Leah: -10.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Leah
10.7%
16-29 Age Group
running
Leah: -12.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Leah
12.5%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Leah (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:42 (-9.9%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
Leah
+9.9% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:47 (-7.6%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Leah
+7.6% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:35 (+0.7%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 42:07 (-12.5%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
Leah
+12.5% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:03 (-6.9%) | 1:55 (+0.0%) |
Leah
+6.9% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:38 (-25.7%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
Leah
+25.7% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:30 (-3.0%) | 2:17 (+0.0%) |
Leah
+3.0% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:10 (-7.2%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
Leah
+7.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Leah, Orange = 16-29 Age Group