Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:26:16
Country: (1345 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Eva: -5.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Eva
5.1%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Eva: +3.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Eva
3.7%
16-29 Age Group
running
Eva: +9.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Eva
9.1%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Eva (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:51 (-6.1%) | 4:06 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+6.1% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:35 (-4.4%) | 5:09 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+4.4% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:11 (-4.9%) | 4:45 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+4.9% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 39:53 (+9.1%) | 42:41 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.1% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:38 (-2.5%) | 1:52 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+2.5% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:51 (-4.3%) | 3:34 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+4.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:58 (+8.3%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.3% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:56 (+20.8%) | 1:48 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+20.8% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:38 (-3.9%) | 4:25 (+0.0%) |
Eva
+3.9% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Eva, Orange = 16-29 Age Group