Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:26:38
Country: (446 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emma: +3.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
3.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emma: -0.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
0.1%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emma: +6.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
6.8%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emma (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:42 (-3.0%) | 3:47 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+3.0% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:56 (+5.2%) | 5:06 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:38 (+7.5%) | 4:40 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.5% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 37:08 (+6.8%) | 42:27 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.8% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:40 (+4.4%) | 1:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:50 (+2.6%) | 3:33 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.6% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:40 (+3.5%) | 3:15 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.5% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:23 (-7.7%) | 1:57 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+7.7% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:28 (-3.4%) | 4:30 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+3.4% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emma, Orange = 16-29 Age Group