Performance Analysis
Abu Dhabi 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Marco Zorilla
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (35-39).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-17.0%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-28.0%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
-45.9%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: 32.9
High fatigue - significant pacing issues, focus on conditioning
Your pace drop: +35.5%
Race avg drop: +2.6%
Trend per run: +12.4%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 5:53 | 7:17 | -19.3% | 64th | 5:37 |
| Run 2 | 5:37 | 6:30 | -13.7% | 75th | 5:03 |
| Run 3 | 7:32 | 7:01 | +7.1% | 99th | 5:28 |
| Run 4 | 8:03 | 7:19 | +9.8% | 99th | 5:33 |
Training Recommendations
- → Performance is well-balanced across all categories!
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:59 | 4:37 | -14.0% | 40th | 4:05 |
| Sled Push | strength | 1:46 | 2:39 | -33.6% | 40th | 1:56 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:05 | 4:45 | -14.2% | 81th | 3:29 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:32 | 4:29 | -21.4% | 66th | 3:18 |
| Row | aerobic | 4:32 | 5:22 | -15.6% | 53th | 4:35 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:32 | 2:16 | -32.4% | 23th | 1:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:51 | 5:17 | -27.2% | 52th | 3:53 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:07 | 6:07 | -32.7% | 23th | 4:42 |
| Total Running | running | 27:05 | 50:04 | -45.9% | 3th | 38:04 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (95.7th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength