Performance Analysis
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Women Fr Sa
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Camilla Hellman
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (30-34).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-7.2%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-9.2%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
+10.7%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: -2.7
Good pacing - slightly better endurance than average
Your pace drop: -16.6%
Race avg drop: -13.9%
Trend per run: -4.3%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 6:11 | 5:36 | +10.3% | 73th | 5:54 |
| Run 2 | 4:10 | 3:40 | +13.2% | 81th | 3:53 |
| Run 3 | 4:37 | 3:53 | +18.6% | 91th | 4:07 |
| Run 4 | 4:15 | 3:54 | +8.8% | 66th | 4:08 |
| Run 5 | 4:18 | 3:57 | +8.6% | 66th | 4:11 |
| Run 6 | 4:16 | 3:54 | +9.0% | 68th | 4:08 |
| Run 7 | 4:22 | 3:57 | +10.2% | 70th | 4:12 |
Training Recommendations
- → Focus on running endurance - 10.7% below expected on total running time
- → Specific weakness: Total Running - 10.7% slower than expected
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:21 | 4:32 | -4.3% | 5th | 4:41 |
| Sled Push | strength | 2:55 | 3:28 | -15.9% | 11th | 4:05 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:17 | 4:57 | -13.7% | 7th | 5:35 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:38 | 4:05 | -11.1% | 10th | 4:34 |
| Row | aerobic | 4:23 | 4:40 | -6.3% | 2th | 4:50 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:59 | 1:55 | +3.4% | 41th | 2:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:41 | 3:56 | -6.5% | 17th | 4:22 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:08 | 4:46 | -13.3% | 10th | 5:32 |
| Total Running | running | 32:09 | 29:03 | +10.7% | 73th | 30:43 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (30.0th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength