Performance Analysis
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Michael Seib
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (30-39).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-4.3%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-0.9%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
-45.0%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: -37.7
Excellent endurance - maintaining pace better than field
Your pace drop: -34.2%
Race avg drop: +3.5%
Trend per run: -26.5%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 8:39 | 6:01 | +43.4% | 100th | 5:24 |
| Run 2 | 5:18 | 5:37 | -5.8% | 67th | 5:02 |
| Run 3 | 5:48 | 5:49 | -0.4% | 81th | 5:12 |
| Run 4 | 3:23 | 6:00 | -43.6% | 0th | 5:20 |
Training Recommendations
- → Specific weakness: Sled Push - 10.9% slower than expected
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:11 | 4:15 | -1.6% | 76th | 4:01 |
| Sled Push | strength | 2:14 | 2:00 | +10.9% | 93th | 1:45 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:11 | 3:03 | +3.9% | 86th | 2:38 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:13 | 3:33 | -9.5% | 68th | 2:56 |
| Row | aerobic | 4:42 | 4:46 | -1.7% | 76th | 4:28 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:57 | 2:00 | -3.2% | 73th | 1:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:56 | 4:09 | -5.4% | 74th | 3:30 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:32 | 5:04 | -10.6% | 62th | 4:28 |
| Total Running | running | 23:08 | 42:01 | -45.0% | 0th | 37:11 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (81.1th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength