Performance Analysis
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Karl Schultz
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (16-29).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-9.6%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-8.8%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
-48.8%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: -7.9
Excellent endurance - maintaining pace better than field
Your pace drop: -4.4%
Race avg drop: +3.5%
Trend per run: -2.8%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 6:22 | 6:32 | -2.6% | 91th | 5:24 |
| Run 2 | 5:39 | 6:05 | -7.2% | 82th | 5:02 |
| Run 3 | 5:41 | 6:18 | -10.0% | 77th | 5:12 |
| Run 4 | 5:48 | 6:32 | -11.3% | 76th | 5:20 |
Training Recommendations
- → Specific weakness: Farmers Carry - 13.1% slower than expected
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:15 | 4:25 | -4.0% | 82th | 4:01 |
| Sled Push | strength | 1:54 | 2:13 | -14.4% | 73th | 1:45 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:49 | 3:23 | -17.1% | 70th | 2:38 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:19 | 4:02 | -18.0% | 73th | 2:56 |
| Row | aerobic | 4:41 | 5:01 | -6.8% | 75th | 4:28 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:30 | 2:12 | +13.1% | 100th | 1:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:46 | 4:40 | +1.9% | 93th | 3:30 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:01 | 5:33 | -27.7% | 30th | 4:28 |
| Total Running | running | 23:30 | 45:55 | -48.8% | 1th | 37:11 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (92.7th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength