Performance Analysis
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Chris Signo
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (16-29).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-20.2%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-24.1%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
-36.5%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: 60.3
High fatigue - significant pacing issues, focus on conditioning
Your pace drop: +63.8%
Race avg drop: +3.5%
Trend per run: +10.9%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 5:17 | 6:36 | -20.1% | 45th | 5:24 |
| Run 2 | 5:55 | 6:09 | -3.9% | 89th | 5:02 |
| Run 3 | 12:36 | 6:23 | +97.2% | 100th | 5:12 |
| Run 4 | 5:45 | 6:36 | -13.1% | 73th | 5:20 |
Training Recommendations
- → Performance is well-balanced across all categories!
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:07 | 4:27 | -7.6% | 67th | 4:01 |
| Sled Push | strength | 1:38 | 2:15 | -27.5% | 39th | 1:45 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:30 | 3:26 | -27.5% | 43th | 2:38 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:21 | 4:07 | -42.9% | 22th | 2:56 |
| Row | aerobic | 4:33 | 5:03 | -10.1% | 64th | 4:28 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:51 | 2:14 | -17.4% | 63th | 1:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:41 | 4:45 | -22.6% | 64th | 3:30 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:11 | 5:37 | -25.7% | 42th | 4:28 |
| Total Running | running | 29:33 | 46:30 | -36.5% | 6th | 37:11 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (93.5th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength