Performance Analysis
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Clayton Smith
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (40-49).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-14.1%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-29.9%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
-45.9%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: 5.5
Moderate fatigue - consider endurance training
Your pace drop: +23.6%
Race avg drop: +18.1%
Trend per run: +9.3%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 8:05 | 7:53 | +2.4% | 100th | 5:42 |
| Run 2 | 8:29 | 7:42 | +10.2% | 100th | 5:24 |
| Run 6 | 10:03 | 9:58 | +0.7% | 99th | 6:02 |
| Run 7 | 10:26 | 10:10 | +2.6% | 100th | 6:07 |
Training Recommendations
- → Performance is well-balanced across all categories!
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:24 | 5:07 | -14.1% | 67th | 4:17 |
| Sled Push | strength | 2:12 | 3:29 | -37.0% | 58th | 2:10 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:37 | 5:20 | -32.2% | 70th | 3:20 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:54 | 5:41 | -13.8% | 95th | 3:22 |
| Row | aerobic | 5:04 | 5:54 | -14.2% | 76th | 4:49 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:08 | 2:48 | -23.8% | 76th | 1:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:58 | 6:48 | -27.0% | 83th | 4:04 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:17 | 7:31 | -29.8% | 76th | 4:44 |
| Total Running | running | 37:03 | 68:32 | -45.9% | 38th | 39:05 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (100.0th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength