Performance Analysis
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Nicole Denapoli
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (16-29).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-17.9%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-23.0%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
+9.4%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: -1.5
Average pacing - similar fatigue to field
Your pace drop: +5.9%
Race avg drop: +7.4%
Trend per run: +1.1%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 7:49 | 7:57 | -1.8% | 98th | 6:10 |
| Run 2 | 9:08 | 7:38 | +19.4% | 100th | 5:53 |
| Run 3 | 9:48 | 7:57 | +23.1% | 100th | 6:05 |
| Run 4 | 9:05 | 8:14 | +10.2% | 100th | 6:13 |
| Run 5 | 9:46 | 8:43 | +11.9% | 100th | 6:23 |
| Run 6 | 9:11 | 8:41 | +5.7% | 100th | 6:22 |
| Run 7 | 8:46 | 8:46 | -0.1% | 97th | 6:22 |
Training Recommendations
- → Focus on running endurance - 9.4% below expected on total running time
- → Specific weakness: Total Running - 9.4% slower than expected
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:45 | 5:27 | -12.9% | 60th | 4:42 |
| Sled Push | strength | 1:55 | 2:49 | -32.1% | 52th | 1:57 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:21 | 4:42 | -28.7% | 57th | 3:18 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:30 | 6:02 | -25.6% | 76th | 3:55 |
| Row | aerobic | 5:06 | 6:01 | -15.4% | 49th | 5:09 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:18 | 2:37 | -12.3% | 88th | 1:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:19 | 5:36 | -23.0% | 77th | 3:45 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:55 | 6:04 | -19.1% | 77th | 4:27 |
| Total Running | running | 63:33 | 58:04 | +9.4% | 100th | 42:52 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (98.2th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength