Performance Analysis
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Laina Arteaga
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (30-39).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
+1.5%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-1.4%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
-45.1%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: -2.7
Good pacing - slightly better endurance than average
Your pace drop: +5.0%
Race avg drop: +7.6%
Trend per run: +1.6%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 5:45 | 6:32 | -12.0% | 62th | 5:35 |
| Run 2 | 5:36 | 6:07 | -8.5% | 76th | 5:16 |
| Run 3 | 5:59 | 6:37 | -9.6% | 76th | 5:34 |
| Run 4 | 5:56 | 6:43 | -11.8% | 71th | 5:41 |
Training Recommendations
- → Specific weakness: Wall Balls - 37.5% slower than expected
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 5:01 | 4:57 | +1.2% | 94th | 4:33 |
| Sled Push | strength | 2:49 | 3:03 | -8.0% | 82th | 2:21 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:51 | 4:26 | -13.3% | 66th | 3:38 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:42 | 4:37 | +1.5% | 92th | 3:34 |
| Row | aerobic | 5:34 | 5:27 | +1.9% | 96th | 4:57 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:58 | 2:21 | -16.5% | 50th | 2:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:57 | 5:17 | -6.5% | 85th | 4:12 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 8:37 | 6:16 | +37.5% | 100th | 4:52 |
| Total Running | running | 23:16 | 42:24 | -45.1% | 34th | 29:49 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (91.2th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength