Performance Analysis
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Women
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Zoe Quinn
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (35-39).
Place
107
Total Time
1:30:49
Overall Percentile
57.8
Lower is faster
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-7.3%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
+13.1%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
-73.1%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 6:02 | 5:15 | +14.6% | 86th | 5:13 |
Training Recommendations
- → Focus on lower body/quad strength - 13.1% below expected on strength exercises (Sled Push, Sled Pull)
- → Specific weakness: Sled Push - 41.8% slower than expected
- → Specific weakness: Sled Pull - 38.2% slower than expected
- → Specific weakness: SkiErg - 6.9% slower than expected
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 5:13 | 4:52 | +6.9% | 87th | 4:51 |
| Sled Push | strength | 4:44 | 3:20 | +41.8% | 94th | 3:17 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 6:44 | 4:52 | +38.2% | 95th | 4:49 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:47 | 5:18 | -28.7% | 15th | 5:13 |
| Row | aerobic | 5:09 | 5:09 | -0.1% | 57th | 5:08 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:11 | 2:46 | -21.3% | 22th | 2:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 5:48 | 5:42 | +1.6% | 58th | 5:37 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 7:01 | 6:40 | +5.2% | 66th | 6:34 |
| Total Running | running | 6:02 | 22:25 | -73.1% | 19th | 21:29 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (57.8th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength