Performance Analysis
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with George Gill
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (16-29).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-2.4%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-15.2%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
-7.6%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: -9.5
Excellent endurance - maintaining pace better than field
Your pace drop: -1.1%
Race avg drop: +8.4%
Trend per run: -0.5%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 6:25 | 5:38 | +13.7% | 89th | 5:32 |
| Run 2 | 5:46 | 5:15 | +9.6% | 82th | 5:09 |
| Run 3 | 5:49 | 5:31 | +5.2% | 72th | 5:25 |
| Run 4 | 5:56 | 5:34 | +6.4% | 76th | 5:27 |
| Run 5 | 6:03 | 5:41 | +6.1% | 75th | 5:34 |
| Run 6 | 6:00 | 5:38 | +6.3% | 73th | 5:31 |
Training Recommendations
- → Performance is well-balanced across all categories!
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:21 | 4:22 | -0.6% | 55th | 4:20 |
| Sled Push | strength | 1:39 | 2:02 | -19.1% | 14th | 1:59 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:55 | 3:58 | -26.6% | 6th | 3:52 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:03 | 4:05 | -0.8% | 59th | 3:57 |
| Row | aerobic | 4:33 | 4:49 | -5.7% | 31th | 4:46 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:40 | 1:48 | -8.2% | 37th | 1:46 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:18 | 4:37 | -6.9% | 49th | 4:30 |
| Total Running | running | 35:59 | 38:56 | -7.6% | 36th | 38:07 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (57.4th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength