Performance Analysis
Riga/Rīga 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Compare Performance:
Compare Athletes
Search for an athlete to compare with Aamena Schomberg
Compare with Age Group
Compare your performance against the average of your age group (16-29).
Category Performance Summary
aerobic
-7.0%
vs expected performance
• SkiErg
• Burpee Broad Jump
• Row
strength
-6.8%
vs expected performance
• Sled Push
• Sled Pull
• Farmers Carry
running
-67.2%
vs expected performance
• Total Running
Performance Radar
Click to expand
Performance Radar Chart
Running Splits Analysis
Fatigue Score: -62.2
Excellent endurance - maintaining pace better than field
Your pace drop: -44.2%
Race avg drop: +18.0%
Trend per run: -26.6%
| Segment | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | 4:43 | 4:50 | -2.5% | 51th | 4:41 |
| Run 3 | 4:09 | 6:07 | -32.3% | 0th | 5:56 |
| Run 4 | 0:06 | 6:14 | -98.4% | 0th | 6:02 |
| Run 5 | 3:43 | 6:24 | -42.0% | 0th | 6:11 |
| Run 7 | 1:14 | 6:18 | -80.4% | 0th | 6:06 |
Training Recommendations
- → Specific weakness: Sled Pull - 6.5% slower than expected
Exercise Analysis
| Exercise | Category | Time | Expected | Variance | Percentile | Race Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:12 | 4:17 | -2.2% | 51th | 4:14 |
| Sled Push | strength | 1:36 | 1:47 | -10.6% | 33th | 1:44 |
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:59 | 3:44 | +6.5% | 74th | 3:36 |
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:07 | 3:52 | -19.5% | 30th | 3:40 |
| Row | aerobic | 4:47 | 4:44 | +0.7% | 64th | 4:40 |
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:36 | 1:47 | -10.9% | 32th | 1:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:21 | 4:00 | -16.5% | 32th | 3:50 |
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:25 | 4:32 | -2.6% | 58th | 4:22 |
| Total Running | running | 13:55 | 42:24 | -67.2% | 0th | 41:05 |
How to Read This Analysis
- • Percentile: Your ranking in the race (lower is better for time-based events)
- • Expected Time: Predicted exercise time based on your overall performance level (64.1th percentile)
- • Variance: How much faster (negative) or slower (positive) you were compared to expected
- • Positive variance indicates a relative weakness that may benefit from focused training
- • Negative variance indicates a relative strength