Age Group Comparison
Rome 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:25:16
Country: (6 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emma: +1.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
1.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emma: +0.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
0.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emma: +1.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
1.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emma (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:46 (+10.7%) | 3:26 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:56 (-1.6%) | 5:04 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+1.6% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:20 (-4.4%) | 4:35 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+4.4% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 37:05 (+1.9%) | 41:13 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:06 (+12.6%) | 1:58 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.6% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:43 (+12.4%) | 4:13 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.4% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:04 (-14.9%) | 4:25 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+14.9% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:18 (-3.7%) | 2:13 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+3.7% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:04 (-3.8%) | 4:04 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+3.8% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emma, Orange = 16-29 Age Group