Age Group Comparison
Rome 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:24:21
Country: (154 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Camilla: -12.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Camilla
12.1%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Camilla: -17.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Camilla
17.8%
16-29 Age Group
running
Camilla: +11.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Camilla
11.6%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Camilla (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:11 (-17.4%) | 3:50 (+0.0%) |
Camilla
+17.4% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:41 (-10.5%) | 4:57 (+0.0%) |
Camilla
+10.5% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:19 (-8.5%) | 4:34 (+0.0%) |
Camilla
+8.5% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 44:47 (+11.6%) | 36:26 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+11.6% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:06 (+4.5%) | 2:00 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.5% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:05 (-13.4%) | 4:08 (+0.0%) |
Camilla
+13.4% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:34 (-33.4%) | 4:27 (+0.0%) |
Camilla
+33.4% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:59 (-24.6%) | 2:21 (+0.0%) |
Camilla
+24.6% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:36 (-22.2%) | 4:50 (+0.0%) |
Camilla
+22.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Camilla, Orange = 16-29 Age Group