Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men

Pim Schabbink

Place: 315
Time: 1:09:03
Country:
Percentile: 27.3th
View detailed analysis →

16-24 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:20:36
Country: (1213 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Pim: +0.5% | 16-24 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
0.5%
16-24 Age Group
strength Pim: -5.9% | 16-24 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
5.9%
16-24 Age Group
running Pim: +3.9% | 16-24 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
3.9%
16-24 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Pim (vs Expected) 16-24 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 2:58 (+4.1%) 3:15 (+0.0%)
16-24 Age Group +4.1% better
Row aerobic 4:16 (+0.2%) 4:39 (+0.0%)
16-24 Age Group +0.2% better
SkiErg aerobic 3:44 (-2.8%) 4:05 (+0.0%)
Pim +2.8% better
Total Running running 33:49 (+3.9%) 38:27 (+0.0%)
16-24 Age Group +3.9% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:18 (-12.0%) 1:40 (+0.0%)
Pim +12.0% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 3:30 (+11.4%) 3:40 (+0.0%)
16-24 Age Group +11.4% better
Sled Pull strength 2:41 (-9.2%) 3:46 (+0.0%)
Pim +9.2% better
Sled Push strength 1:15 (-14.6%) 1:50 (+0.0%)
Pim +14.6% better
Wall Balls strength 4:02 (-5.1%) 5:03 (+0.0%)
Pim +5.1% better

How to Read This Comparison