Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men

Pim Lier

Place: 341
Time: 1:09:36
Country:
Percentile: 29.7th
View detailed analysis →

35-39 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:17:05
Country: (220 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Pim: +9.0% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
9.0%
35-39 Age Group
strength Pim: -2.1% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
2.1%
35-39 Age Group
running Pim: +1.0% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
1.0%
35-39 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Pim (vs Expected) 35-39 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 3:48 (+31.4%) 3:26 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +31.4% better
Row aerobic 3:56 (-8.0%) 4:29 (+0.0%)
Pim +8.0% better
SkiErg aerobic 3:59 (+3.4%) 4:00 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +3.4% better
Total Running running 33:09 (+1.0%) 36:47 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +1.0% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:16 (-14.9%) 1:40 (+0.0%)
Pim +14.9% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 3:35 (+12.8%) 3:47 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +12.8% better
Sled Pull strength 2:02 (-31.9%) 3:24 (+0.0%)
Pim +31.9% better
Sled Push strength 1:12 (-18.7%) 1:40 (+0.0%)
Pim +18.7% better
Wall Balls strength 6:07 (+42.4%) 4:58 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +42.4% better

How to Read This Comparison