Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men

Pim Kanters

Place: 550
Time: 1:14:06
Country:
Percentile: 47.7th
View detailed analysis →

25-29 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:35
Country: (2349 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Pim: +8.7% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
8.7%
25-29 Age Group
strength Pim: +1.6% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
1.6%
25-29 Age Group
running Pim: +0.6% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
0.6%
25-29 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Pim (vs Expected) 25-29 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 4:03 (+25.4%) 3:14 (+0.0%)
25-29 Age Group +25.4% better
Row aerobic 4:27 (+1.0%) 4:36 (+0.0%)
25-29 Age Group +1.0% better
SkiErg aerobic 3:56 (-0.5%) 4:03 (+0.0%)
Pim +0.5% better
Total Running running 35:19 (+0.6%) 38:00 (+0.0%)
25-29 Age Group +0.6% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:39 (+3.8%) 1:41 (+0.0%)
25-29 Age Group +3.8% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 3:39 (+5.0%) 3:40 (+0.0%)
25-29 Age Group +5.0% better
Sled Pull strength 3:12 (-1.5%) 3:36 (+0.0%)
Pim +1.5% better
Sled Push strength 1:34 (-0.2%) 1:47 (+0.0%)
Pim +0.2% better
Wall Balls strength 4:42 (+0.9%) 4:46 (+0.0%)
25-29 Age Group +0.9% better

How to Read This Comparison