Age Group Comparison
Boston 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:55
Country: (11 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emily: -8.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
8.1%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emily: -3.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
3.6%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emily: +2.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
2.6%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emily (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:35 (-7.8%) | 3:35 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+7.8% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:12 (-4.5%) | 4:57 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+4.5% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:30 (-11.9%) | 4:36 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+11.9% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 49:41 (+2.6%) | 41:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.6% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:39 (-19.2%) | 1:42 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+19.2% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:05 (-5.8%) | 3:22 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+5.8% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:43 (-5.6%) | 4:03 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+5.6% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:54 (+1.3%) | 1:35 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:55 (+11.5%) | 4:25 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+11.5% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emily, Orange = 16-29 Age Group