Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women

Fleur Kamp

Place: 367
Time: 1:22:15
Country:
Percentile: 35.0th
View detailed analysis →

35-39 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:28:09
Country: (151 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Fleur: -1.3% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Fleur
1.3%
35-39 Age Group
strength Fleur: +2.6% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Fleur
2.6%
35-39 Age Group
running Fleur: +2.7% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Fleur
2.7%
35-39 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Fleur (vs Expected) 35-39 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 4:08 (+6.5%) 4:36 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +6.5% better
Row aerobic 4:25 (-10.0%) 5:05 (+0.0%)
Fleur +10.0% better
SkiErg aerobic 4:30 (-0.4%) 4:39 (+0.0%)
Fleur +0.4% better
Total Running running 40:50 (+2.7%) 42:27 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +2.7% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:35 (-8.0%) 1:50 (+0.0%)
Fleur +8.0% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 3:39 (+6.4%) 4:03 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +6.4% better
Sled Pull strength 3:57 (+3.9%) 4:16 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +3.9% better
Sled Push strength 1:45 (+14.3%) 1:41 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +14.3% better
Wall Balls strength 4:01 (-3.5%) 4:44 (+0.0%)
Fleur +3.5% better

How to Read This Comparison