Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women

Quinty Boogaard

Place: 386
Time: 1:22:38
Country:
Percentile: 36.7th
View detailed analysis →

16-24 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:29:07
Country: (1606 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Quinty: +1.2% | 16-24 Age Group: +0.0%
Quinty
1.2%
16-24 Age Group
strength Quinty: -8.0% | 16-24 Age Group: +0.0%
Quinty
8.0%
16-24 Age Group
running Quinty: +5.4% | 16-24 Age Group: +0.0%
Quinty
5.4%
16-24 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Quinty (vs Expected) 16-24 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 3:58 (+1.3%) 4:14 (+0.0%)
16-24 Age Group +1.3% better
Row aerobic 5:07 (+4.0%) 5:12 (+0.0%)
16-24 Age Group +4.0% better
SkiErg aerobic 4:27 (-1.7%) 4:41 (+0.0%)
Quinty +1.7% better
Total Running running 42:06 (+5.4%) 42:59 (+0.0%)
16-24 Age Group +5.4% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:44 (+0.3%) 1:51 (+0.0%)
16-24 Age Group +0.3% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 2:44 (-20.9%) 3:41 (+0.0%)
Quinty +20.9% better
Sled Pull strength 3:29 (-8.9%) 4:20 (+0.0%)
Quinty +8.9% better
Sled Push strength 1:30 (-2.5%) 1:41 (+0.0%)
Quinty +2.5% better
Wall Balls strength 3:51 (-8.0%) 4:37 (+0.0%)
Quinty +8.0% better

How to Read This Comparison