Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women

Kim Otten

Place: 81
Time: 1:13:02
Country:
Percentile: 7.7th
View detailed analysis →

35-39 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:28:09
Country: (151 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Kim: +9.1% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Kim
9.1%
35-39 Age Group
strength Kim: +1.2% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Kim
1.2%
35-39 Age Group
running Kim: +3.1% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Kim
3.1%
35-39 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Kim (vs Expected) 35-39 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 3:38 (+18.7%) 4:36 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +18.7% better
Row aerobic 4:48 (+3.9%) 5:05 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +3.9% better
SkiErg aerobic 4:29 (+4.7%) 4:39 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +4.7% better
Total Running running 36:14 (+3.1%) 42:27 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +3.1% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:38 (+7.8%) 1:50 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +7.8% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 2:45 (-3.6%) 4:03 (+0.0%)
Kim +3.6% better
Sled Pull strength 3:07 (-4.6%) 4:16 (+0.0%)
Kim +4.6% better
Sled Push strength 1:27 (+7.3%) 1:41 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +7.3% better
Wall Balls strength 3:34 (-0.7%) 4:44 (+0.0%)
Kim +0.7% better

How to Read This Comparison