Age Group Comparison

Boston 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Women

Comparison Scope:

Leah Klingerman

Place: 897

Time: 1:45:49

Country: United States

Percentile: 71.8th

Place: N/A

Time: 1:37:19

Country: (276 athletes)

Percentile: 50.0th

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Leah: -4.5% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Leah

4.5%

25-29 Age Group

strength Leah: -1.0% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Leah

1.0%

25-29 Age Group

running Leah: -0.1% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Leah

0.1%

25-29 Age Group

Exercise	Category	Leah (vs Expected)	25-29 Age Group (vs Expected)	Better Performance
Burpee Broad Jump	aerobic	7:27 (-4.2%)	6:48 (+0.0%)	Leah +4.2% better
Row	aerobic	5:43 (+0.0%)	5:31 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +0.0% better
SkiErg	aerobic	5:00 (-9.3%)	5:19 (+0.0%)	Leah +9.3% better
Total Running	running	44:51 (-0.1%)	41:47 (+0.0%)	Leah +0.1% better
Farmers Carry	strength	2:39 (+12.5%)	2:13 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +12.5% better
Sandbag Lunges	strength	6:56 (+18.6%)	5:05 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +18.6% better
Sled Pull	strength	6:16 (-10.5%)	6:17 (+0.0%)	Leah +10.5% better
Sled Push	strength	2:17 (-19.8%)	2:35 (+0.0%)	Leah +19.8% better
Wall Balls	strength	8:04 (-5.6%)	7:49 (+0.0%)	Leah +5.6% better

• Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
• Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
• Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
• Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
• Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
• Colors: Blue = Leah, Orange = 25-29 Age Group