Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Men Su
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 0:58:02
Country: (97 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Thomas: +6.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Thomas
6.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Thomas: +1.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Thomas
1.3%
16-29 Age Group
running
Thomas: -1.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Thomas
1.2%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Thomas (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:37 (+25.5%) | 2:23 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+25.5% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:14 (+1.7%) | 3:56 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.7% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:33 (-6.5%) | 3:37 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+6.5% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 28:11 (-1.2%) | 26:19 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+1.2% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:40 (+2.6%) | 1:28 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.6% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:43 (+9.0%) | 2:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.0% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:23 (-0.3%) | 3:46 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+0.3% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:57 (-8.3%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+8.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:14 (+3.6%) | 3:43 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Thomas, Orange = 16-29 Age Group