Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Men Su
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 0:58:02
Country: (97 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Travis: -0.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Travis
0.8%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Travis: +5.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Travis
5.9%
16-29 Age Group
running
Travis: +3.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Travis
3.5%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Travis (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:10 (+4.3%) | 2:23 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.3% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 3:32 (-6.7%) | 3:56 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+6.7% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:30 (-0.1%) | 3:37 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+0.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 25:50 (+3.5%) | 26:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.5% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:32 (+12.3%) | 1:28 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.3% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:15 (-10.2%) | 2:47 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+10.2% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:11 (-2.0%) | 3:46 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+2.0% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:14 (+37.3%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+37.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:07 (-7.8%) | 3:43 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+7.8% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Travis, Orange = 16-29 Age Group