Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Men Su
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 0:58:02
Country: (97 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Jan: +3.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jan
3.7%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Jan: +7.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jan
7.4%
16-29 Age Group
running
Jan: -1.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jan
1.4%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Jan (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:17 (+8.0%) | 2:23 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.0% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 3:51 (+1.2%) | 3:56 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:35 (+1.9%) | 3:37 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.9% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 24:46 (-1.4%) | 26:19 (+0.0%) |
Jan
+1.4% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:39 (+19.8%) | 1:28 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+19.8% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:27 (-3.9%) | 2:47 (+0.0%) |
Jan
+3.9% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:16 (-1.1%) | 3:46 (+0.0%) |
Jan
+1.1% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:37 (-2.0%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
Jan
+2.0% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:14 (+24.0%) | 3:43 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+24.0% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Jan, Orange = 16-29 Age Group