Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women Su
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:06:16
Country: (91 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Lisa: +9.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lisa
9.8%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Lisa: +4.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lisa
4.6%
16-29 Age Group
running
Lisa: +2.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lisa
2.4%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Lisa (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:56 (+29.4%) | 3:05 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+29.4% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 3:58 (-3.3%) | 4:29 (+0.0%) |
Lisa
+3.3% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:00 (+3.3%) | 4:11 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.3% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 26:29 (+2.4%) | 30:21 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.4% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:28 (+7.8%) | 1:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.8% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:50 (+16.5%) | 3:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+16.5% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:03 (+1.3%) | 4:07 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.3% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:23 (-7.3%) | 2:05 (+0.0%) |
Lisa
+7.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:06 (+4.9%) | 3:44 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.9% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Lisa, Orange = 16-29 Age Group