Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women Su
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:06:16
Country: (91 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Amy: +11.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Amy
11.5%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Amy: +4.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Amy
4.7%
16-29 Age Group
running
Amy: -2.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Amy
2.8%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Amy (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:50 (+28.2%) | 3:05 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+28.2% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:29 (+1.1%) | 4:29 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.1% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:21 (+5.1%) | 4:11 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 28:40 (-2.8%) | 30:21 (+0.0%) |
Amy
+2.8% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:38 (+1.6%) | 1:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.6% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:24 (+10.6%) | 3:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.6% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:45 (+23.2%) | 4:07 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+23.2% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:49 (-5.2%) | 2:05 (+0.0%) |
Amy
+5.2% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:20 (-7.0%) | 3:44 (+0.0%) |
Amy
+7.0% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Amy, Orange = 16-29 Age Group