Age Group Comparison

Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Women Fr Sa

Comparison Scope:

Emma Wright

Place: 626

Time: 1:27:24

Country: United Kingdom

Percentile: 90.7th

Place: N/A

Time: 1:23:39

Country: (87 athletes)

Percentile: 50.0th

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Emma: -6.1% | 45-49 Age Group: +0.0%

Emma

6.1%

45-49 Age Group

strength Emma: -10.7% | 45-49 Age Group: +0.0%

Emma

10.7%

45-49 Age Group

running Emma: +4.5% | 45-49 Age Group: +0.0%

Emma

4.5%

45-49 Age Group

Exercise	Category	Emma (vs Expected)	45-49 Age Group (vs Expected)	Better Performance
Burpee Broad Jump	aerobic	4:53 (-14.8%)	5:06 (+0.0%)	Emma +14.8% better
Row	aerobic	5:10 (-1.6%)	5:01 (+0.0%)	Emma +1.6% better
SkiErg	aerobic	4:56 (-2.1%)	4:48 (+0.0%)	Emma +2.1% better
Total Running	running	36:14 (+4.5%)	33:24 (+0.0%)	45-49 Age Group +4.5% better
Farmers Carry	strength	3:16 (+16.1%)	2:25 (+0.0%)	45-49 Age Group +16.1% better
Sandbag Lunges	strength	4:58 (-8.1%)	4:54 (+0.0%)	Emma +8.1% better
Sled Pull	strength	5:03 (-28.5%)	6:01 (+0.0%)	Emma +28.5% better
Sled Push	strength	4:48 (-13.6%)	4:23 (+0.0%)	Emma +13.6% better
Wall Balls	strength	5:55 (-19.7%)	6:22 (+0.0%)	Emma +19.7% better

• Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
• Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
• Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
• Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
• Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
• Colors: Blue = Emma, Orange = 45-49 Age Group