Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Women Fr Sa
Comparison Scope:
45-49 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:39
Country: (87 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Liv: -3.8% |
45-49 Age Group: +0.0%
Liv
3.8%
45-49 Age Group
strength
Liv: -20.6% |
45-49 Age Group: +0.0%
Liv
20.6%
45-49 Age Group
running
Liv: +7.8% |
45-49 Age Group: +0.0%
Liv
7.8%
45-49 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Liv (vs Expected) | 45-49 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 6:52 (+4.3%) | 5:06 (+0.0%) |
45-49 Age Group
+4.3% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:17 (-4.7%) | 5:01 (+0.0%) |
Liv
+4.7% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:43 (-10.9%) | 4:48 (+0.0%) |
Liv
+10.9% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 40:33 (+7.8%) | 33:24 (+0.0%) |
45-49 Age Group
+7.8% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:02 (-38.0%) | 2:25 (+0.0%) |
Liv
+38.0% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:41 (-24.0%) | 4:54 (+0.0%) |
Liv
+24.0% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 6:58 (-14.5%) | 6:01 (+0.0%) |
Liv
+14.5% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 5:53 (-11.4%) | 4:23 (+0.0%) |
Liv
+11.4% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 7:24 (-15.1%) | 6:22 (+0.0%) |
Liv
+15.1% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Liv, Orange = 45-49 Age Group