Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:15:30
Country: (320 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Travis: -3.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Travis
3.8%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Travis: -4.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Travis
4.1%
16-29 Age Group
running
Travis: +5.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Travis
5.7%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Travis (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:12 (-10.5%) | 2:45 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+10.5% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:19 (+1.9%) | 4:27 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.9% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:45 (-2.7%) | 3:59 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+2.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 35:13 (+5.7%) | 37:16 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.7% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:20 (-15.7%) | 1:44 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+15.7% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:55 (-2.5%) | 3:17 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+2.5% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:25 (+4.3%) | 2:36 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.3% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:32 (-1.3%) | 1:47 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+1.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:46 (-5.5%) | 4:31 (+0.0%) |
Travis
+5.5% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Travis, Orange = 16-29 Age Group