Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emma: -6.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
6.7%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emma: -8.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
8.9%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emma: +2.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
2.6%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emma (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:29 (-5.4%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+5.4% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:36 (-7.4%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+7.4% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:05 (-7.3%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+7.3% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 44:00 (+2.6%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.6% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:40 (-18.6%) | 1:55 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+18.6% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:14 (-4.1%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+4.1% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:56 (-18.5%) | 3:23 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+18.5% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:46 (-24.7%) | 2:17 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+24.7% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 6:10 (+21.3%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+21.3% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emma, Orange = 16-29 Age Group