Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emily: -6.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
6.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emily: +7.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
7.7%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emily: -2.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
2.7%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emily (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:35 (-2.9%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+2.9% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:34 (-8.2%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+8.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:01 (-8.8%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+8.8% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 41:50 (-2.7%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+2.7% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:16 (+10.6%) | 1:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.6% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:23 (-0.9%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+0.9% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:52 (+7.2%) | 3:23 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.2% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:17 (-2.8%) | 2:17 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+2.8% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 6:20 (+24.3%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+24.3% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emily, Orange = 16-29 Age Group