Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emily: +1.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
1.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emily: -12.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
12.0%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emily: -1.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
1.4%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emily (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:09 (+8.3%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.3% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:51 (-3.8%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+3.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:28 (+0.3%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.3% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 44:07 (-1.4%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+1.4% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:43 (-18.3%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+18.3% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:39 (+1.5%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.5% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:08 (-15.9%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+15.9% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:53 (-22.4%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+22.4% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:00 (-4.9%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+4.9% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emily, Orange = 16-29 Age Group