Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Nick: -15.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nick
15.3%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Nick: -0.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nick
0.9%
16-29 Age Group
running
Nick: -4.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nick
4.0%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Nick (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:43 (-32.5%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+32.5% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:50 (-5.9%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+5.9% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:11 (-7.5%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+7.5% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 45:15 (-4.0%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+4.0% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:00 (-7.9%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+7.9% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:50 (-20.1%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+20.1% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:28 (-10.8%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+10.8% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:59 (+17.8%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+17.8% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 6:22 (+16.3%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+16.3% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Nick, Orange = 16-29 Age Group