Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Amanda: -20.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Amanda
20.4%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Amanda: -18.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Amanda
18.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Amanda: +94.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Amanda
94.3%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Amanda (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:49 (-37.7%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
Amanda
+37.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:40 (-13.3%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Amanda
+13.3% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:13 (-10.2%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
Amanda
+10.2% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 103:36 (+94.3%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+94.3% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:21 (-0.2%) | 1:55 (+0.0%) |
Amanda
+0.2% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:55 (-26.9%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
Amanda
+26.9% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:14 (-20.4%) | 2:17 (+0.0%) |
Amanda
+20.4% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:27 (-26.4%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
Amanda
+26.4% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Amanda, Orange = 16-29 Age Group