Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emily: -3.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
3.7%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emily: -23.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
23.3%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emily: -35.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
35.3%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emily (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:39 (-9.1%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+9.1% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:34 (-1.8%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+1.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:54 (-0.1%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+0.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 39:15 (-35.3%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+35.3% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:18 (-28.7%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+28.7% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:59 (-37.9%) | 3:23 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+37.9% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:31 (-19.6%) | 2:17 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+19.6% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 6:15 (-7.1%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+7.1% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emily, Orange = 16-29 Age Group