Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Sarah: +3.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sarah
3.5%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Sarah: +4.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sarah
4.4%
16-29 Age Group
running
Sarah: +113.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sarah
113.6%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Sarah (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:46 (+1.0%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.0% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:19 (+6.0%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.0% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 66:36 (+113.6%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+113.6% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:55 (+12.7%) | 1:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.7% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:30 (+4.4%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.4% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:48 (-0.4%) | 3:23 (+0.0%) |
Sarah
+0.4% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:44 (-5.3%) | 2:17 (+0.0%) |
Sarah
+5.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:26 (+10.6%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Sarah, Orange = 16-29 Age Group