Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emily: -0.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
0.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emily: +51.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
51.8%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emily: -82.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
82.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emily (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:28 (-12.7%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+12.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:54 (+7.7%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.7% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:17 (+4.4%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.4% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 5:31 (-82.9%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+82.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:56 (+11.6%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+11.6% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:18 (-4.3%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+4.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 10:19 (+258.1%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+258.1% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:31 (-19.2%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+19.2% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:37 (+12.5%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.5% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emily, Orange = 16-29 Age Group