Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Mitchell: -3.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Mitchell
3.4%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Mitchell: +4.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Mitchell
4.9%
16-29 Age Group
running
Mitchell: +110.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Mitchell
110.3%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Mitchell (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:43 (-6.5%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
Mitchell
+6.5% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:28 (-2.6%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Mitchell
+2.6% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:05 (-1.1%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
Mitchell
+1.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 69:53 (+110.3%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+110.3% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:00 (+13.5%) | 1:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+13.5% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:40 (+3.7%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.7% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:04 (+7.6%) | 2:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.6% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:59 (-5.1%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
Mitchell
+5.1% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Mitchell, Orange = 16-29 Age Group