Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Sicheng: -2.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sicheng
2.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Sicheng: -3.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sicheng
3.0%
16-29 Age Group
running
Sicheng: +90.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sicheng
90.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Sicheng (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:06 (+2.9%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.9% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:24 (-5.2%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Sicheng
+5.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:54 (-6.4%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
Sicheng
+6.4% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 66:02 (+90.9%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+90.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:49 (+0.8%) | 1:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.8% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:35 (-2.1%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
Sicheng
+2.1% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:53 (-4.9%) | 2:17 (+0.0%) |
Sicheng
+4.9% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:04 (-5.9%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
Sicheng
+5.9% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Sicheng, Orange = 16-29 Age Group