Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Flora: +4.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Flora
4.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Flora: -1.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Flora
1.9%
16-29 Age Group
running
Flora: +7.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Flora
7.5%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Flora (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:30 (+7.8%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.8% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:01 (+5.5%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.5% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:16 (+0.4%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.4% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 40:18 (+7.5%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.5% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:46 (-6.4%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
Flora
+6.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:00 (+1.9%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.9% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:50 (-12.4%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Flora
+12.4% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:23 (+13.1%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+13.1% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:19 (-5.9%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Flora
+5.9% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Flora, Orange = 16-29 Age Group