Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Maggie: -4.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Maggie
4.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Maggie: -8.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Maggie
8.2%
16-29 Age Group
running
Maggie: +172.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Maggie
172.7%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Maggie (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:39 (-18.7%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
Maggie
+18.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:55 (+3.2%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:20 (+1.8%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.8% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 102:41 (+172.7%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+172.7% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:03 (+8.3%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.3% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:18 (-16.2%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
Maggie
+16.2% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:55 (-9.4%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
Maggie
+9.4% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:54 (-15.3%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Maggie
+15.3% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Maggie, Orange = 16-29 Age Group