Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:26:38
Country: (446 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Tara: +3.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Tara
3.7%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Tara: +6.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Tara
6.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Tara: -24.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Tara
24.6%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Tara (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:16 (+11.4%) | 3:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+11.4% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:39 (-2.2%) | 5:06 (+0.0%) |
Tara
+2.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:27 (+2.0%) | 4:40 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.0% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 27:02 (-24.6%) | 42:27 (+0.0%) |
Tara
+24.6% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:36 (-2.6%) | 1:54 (+0.0%) |
Tara
+2.6% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:53 (-0.3%) | 3:33 (+0.0%) |
Tara
+0.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:57 (+10.3%) | 3:15 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.3% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:46 (+13.3%) | 1:57 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+13.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:08 (+11.6%) | 4:30 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+11.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Tara, Orange = 16-29 Age Group